Risk Register Seed List
Ported from reference/Risk Register.md in the legacy ISMS backup. Use this as the current maintained Markdown version and track operational records in core12-isms-management.
Guidelines when completing a Data Protection Assessment
-
Unintentional data disclosure
-
Lack of security awareness training
-
Failure to follow security procedure
-
Unpatched OS / Software
-
Missing or incorrect configuration
-
Weak or reused passwords
-
Lack of endpoint protection
-
Insufficient Backup / Recovery plan
-
Insufficient Access Control Review processes.
-
Insufficient review of vendor contracts or SLAs
-
Misunderstanding of classification levels
-
Excessive data collection or retention
-
Unclassified or misclassified information
-
Inadequate protection of PII or confidential data
-
Missing or incorrect configuration
-
Lack of endpoint protection
-
Misunderstanding of classification levels
-
Insufficient Backup / Recovery plan
-
Inadequate onboarding/offboarding processes
-
No documented procedures for key processes
-
No change management or approval process
-
Insufficient review of vendor contracts or SLAs
-
Insufficient Backup / Recovery plan
๐ง Human / Personnelโ
-
Lack of security awareness training
-
Failure to follow security procedures
-
Weak or reused passwords
-
Misdelivery of emails or documents
-
Inadequate onboarding/offboarding processes
-
Social engineering susceptibility
-
Unintentional data disclosure
-
Access granted beyond need-to-know
-
Personal accounts used for Core 12 or client collaboration without approval or review
๐ ๏ธ Technical / IT Systemsโ
-
Unpatched OS / Software
-
Unsupported legacy systems
-
Default or hardcoded passwords
-
Legacy shared password spreadsheets remain in use after password-manager migration
-
Lack of endpoint protection
-
Insecure APIs or web apps
-
Lack of input validation (e.g., XSS, SQLi)
-
Poor logging or audit trails
-
Missing encryption (at rest or in transit)
-
Misconfigured cloud storage (e.g., open buckets)
๐งพ Process / Policy / Governanceโ
-
Missing or outdated policies
-
No documented procedures for key processes
-
No change management or approval process
-
Lack of documented roles/responsibilities
-
Inconsistent data classification or handling
-
Inadequate backup or disaster recovery testing
-
Lack of segregation of duties
-
Shared credential owner, group assignment, or rotation responsibility is not documented
-
No formal risk assessment process
-
Insufficient review of vendor contracts or SLAs
๐ Network / Infrastructureโ
-
Open Wi-Fi without VPN enforcement
-
Unsecured ports or services
-
Flat network with no segmentation
-
Lack of firewall rules or reviews
-
No intrusion detection or monitoring
-
Public IP exposure without proper hardening
๐งณ Physical / Environmentalโ
-
Unlocked cabinets or server rooms
-
No CCTV in secure areas
-
No badge or access control system
-
Visitor access not logged or monitored
-
Shared workspaces without clean desk enforcement
-
No facility-specific emergency plans
โ๏ธ Cloud / SaaS / Vendorโ
-
No review of cloud provider security posture
-
No defined ownership of cloud configurations
-
Lack of visibility into subcontractor use
-
Insecure file sharing or storage settings
-
Overreliance on one cloud region/provider
-
SaaS tools enabled without IT oversight
-
Shadow IT (tools used without approval)
-
Google, Apple, or client SaaS accounts created outside the approved primary identity account model
AI / Automationโ
-
Unapproved AI tools used with client or Core 12 Confidential information
-
Sensitive information disclosed through prompts, uploaded files, transcripts, embeddings, or tool context
-
AI-generated code merged without human review, testing, or security checks
-
AI agents granted excessive access to repositories, files, browsers, shells, APIs, or production systems
-
AI output used as factual, legal, security, or compliance evidence without verification
-
Prompt injection or malicious tool output causing unsafe downstream action
-
Unclear AI vendor data retention, model training, deletion, or subcontractor terms
-
Client data used for model training or fine-tuning without written authorization
-
Personal or reimbursed AI accounts connected to Core 12 services without inventory, access review, or offboarding controls
-
Core 12 or client work products duplicated, synchronized, or retained in personal AI workspaces
-
AI tools used to work on concepts, systems, repositories, or projects outside the user's role without senior management approval
๐ Data Handling / Retentionโ
-
No retention schedule or enforcement
-
Insecure disposal of physical/digital media
-
Unclassified or misclassified information
-
Excessive data collection or retention
-
Unclassified or misclassified information
-
Inadequate protection of PII or confidential data
-
No DLP (Data Loss Prevention) controls